AbstractThis article discusses the notion of narrative and its relevance in the analysis of different genres of climate change discourse. Two distinct genres are studied, the first of which is the political speech, exemplified by French President François Hollande’s prepared remarks at the climate change conference (COP21) in Paris in late 2015. The second genre has not yet received a label, but can be called “survey discourse”. This refers to answers to open-ended questions in a survey undertaken by the Norwegian Citizen Panel in 2015, where respondents answer freely in their own words the following question: “Concerning climate change, what do you think should be done?” The differences between the two genres are manifold. A political speech is carefully drafted by professionals and represents an institutional commitment by a leader, whereas survey answers are formulated by anonymous, non-specialist respondents, who are not bound by their statements in any way. Despite such differences, our findings will show that all the texts in question comprise a plot where the different characters (heroes, victims, and villains) are integrated into the unfolding ‘story’, thus reflecting the socially pervasive nature of narratives.
Adam Jean-Michel. 1992. Les textes: types et prototypes. Paris: Nathan.
Fløttum, Kjersti. 2017. “Willingness to Action.” In The Role of Language in the Climate Change Debate, edited by Kjersti Fløttum, 113–29. New York/London: Routledge.
Fløttum, Kjersti, and Tonje J. Espeland. 2014. “Norske klimanarrativer— hvor mange ‘fortellinger’? En lingvistisk og diskursiv analyse av to norske stortingsmeldinger.” Sakprosa 6 (4):1–18.
Fløttum, Kjersti, and Øyvind Gjerstad. 2013a. “Arguing for Climate Policy through the Linguistic Construction of Narratives and Voices: The Case of the South-African Green Paper ‘National Climate Change Response’.” Climatic Change 118:417–30.
Fløttum, Kjersti, and Øyvind Gjerstad. 2013b. “The Role of Social Justice and Poverty in South Africa’s National Climate Change Response White Paper.” SJHR 29 (1):61–90.
Fløttum, Kjersti, and Øyvind Gjerstad. 2016. “Narratives in Climate Change Discourse.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, doi:10.1002/wcc.429 (accessed 9 January, 2017).
Gjerstad, Øyvind. 2017. “Competing Climate Change Narratives: An Analysis of Leader Statements During cop21 in Paris.” In The Role of Language in the Climate Change Debate, edited by Kjersti Fløttum, 31–48. New York/London: Routledge.
Gjerstad, Øyvind, and Kjersti Fløttum. (forthcoming). “From Refutation to Description: Negation as a Rhetorical Tool in Climate Change Discourse.” In Pragmatics of Negation, edited by Malin Roitman. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nølke, Henning, Kjersti Fløttum, and Coco Norén. 2004. ScaPoLine: la théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris: Kimé.
Propp, Vladimir. 1958. Morphology of the Folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Tvinnereim, Endre, Kjersti Fløttum, Øyvind Gjerstad, M.P. Johannesson, and Åsta D. Nordø. 2017. “Citizens’ Preferences for Tackling Climate Change: Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of their Freely Formulated Solutions.” Global Environmental Change 46: 34–41.
Van Dijk, Teun A. 1980. Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Werlich Egon. 1976. A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.
Copyright (c) 2017 Øyvind Gjerstad, Kjersti Fløttum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).