AbstractThis article focuses on the importance of language as a means to acquire knowledge in traditional content subjects at school. The article's aim is threefold: to introduce the term ‘language of schooling’; to point to some recent research findings in the field; to discuss what a focus on language in subject classes could mean in a school context. The article builds on findings from the project Language descriptors for migrant and minority students’ success in compulsory education, hosted by the European Centre for Modern Languages (ECML) in Graz in 2012 and 2013 (Moe et al. 2015), and materials collected in connection with an ECML think tank on the language of schooling in September 2016 (ECML 2016).
Alderson, J.C., N. Figueras, H. Kuijper, G. Nold, S. Takala, and C. Tardieu. 2006. “Analysing Tests of Reading and Listening in Relation to the Common European Framework of Reference: The Experience of The Dutch cefr Construct Project.” Language Assessment Quarterly 3 (1):3–20.
Beacco, J.C., D. Coste, P.H. van de Ven, and H. Vollmer. 2010. “Language and School Subjects: Linguistic Dimensions of Knowledge Building in School Curricula.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe, http://www.coe. int/t/dg4/linguistic/langeduc/BoxD2-OtherSub_en.asp#s2 (accessed 29 January, 2017).
Beacco, J.C. 2010. “Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling necessary for Learning/teaching History (end of compulsory education): an Approach with Reference Points.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division, https:// www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Source2010_ForumGeneva/1_ LIS-History2010_en.pdf (accessed 29 January, 2017).
Blair, B. and K.T. Sundet (2016). “Social Science Reading Constructs and the cefr Reading Level of Textbooks.” Paper presented at the 13th annual conference of ealta in Valencia, Spain., May 2016.
Caro, D.H. and D. Cortés. 2012. “Measuring Family Socioeconomic Status: An Illustration using Data from pirls 2006.” In Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments. ieri Monograph Series Volume 5:9–33. Educational Testing Service and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Christensen, R. 2014a. ”Mange av elevene forstår ikke norsk.” Bergens Tidende 28 May:8–9.
Christensen, R. 2014b. ”Det er hyklersk å droppe språkkrav.” Bergens Tidende 3 June:12.
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J. 1979. “Cognitive/academic Language Proficiency, Linguistic Interdependence, the Optimum Age Question and Some Other Matters.” Working Papers on Bilingualism 19:121–29.
ecml 2012–2015. Language Skills for Successful Subject Learning, http:// www.ecml.at/ECML-Programme/Programme2012-2015/LanguageDescriptors/tabid/1800/Default.aspx (accessed 29 January, 2017).
ecml 2016. Think Tanks Within the ecml 5th Medium-term Programme: Languages at the Heart of Learning, http://www.ecml.at/ECML-Programme/Thinktanks/tabid/1913/language/en-GB/Default.aspx (accessed 29 January, 2017).
Gudbrandsen, F. 2014. “Norsk først.” Bergens Tidende 28 May:8.
Linneweber-Lammerskitten, H. 2012. “Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling Necessary for Learning/teaching Mathematics (at the end of compulsory education). An Approach with Reference Points.” Strasbourg: Language Policy Unit, Directorate of Education, dgil. Council of Europe, https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Source2010_ForumGeneva/4_LIS-Mathematics2012_EN.pdf (accessed January 29 2017)
Moe, E., M. Härmälä, P.L. Kristmanson, J. Pascoal, and M. Ramoniené. 2015. Language Skills for Successful Subject Learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Moe, E., M. Härmälä, and P.L. Kristmanson. 2015. “Learning Subject Matter in a Second Language: A cefr-based Tool to Support Immigrant and Migrant Students.” In Language Assessment for Multilingualism: Proceedings of the alte Paris Conference April 2014 (Studies in Language Testing 44), edited by Docherty, C. and F. Barker, 132– 53. Cambridge: ugles/Cambridge University Press.
Mullis, I.V.S., M.O. Martin, P. Foy, and A. Arora. 2012. timss 2011 International Results in Mathematics. Boston: Timss and Pirls International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. 2012. Rammeverk for grunnleggende ferdigheter, https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/ lareplanverket/grunnleggende-ferdigheter/rammeverk-for-grunnleggende-ferdigheter/ (accessed 29 January, 2017).
O’Halloran, K.L. 2003. “Educational Implications of Mathematics as a Multisemiotic Discourse.” In Educational perspectives on Mathematics as Semiosis: From Thinking to Interpreting to Knowing, edited by M. Anderson, A. Saenz-Ludlow, S. Zellweger and V.V. Cifarelli, 185– 214. Brooklyn, NY/Ottawa, Ontario: Legas.
Pieper, I. 2011. “Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling necessary for Learning/teaching Literature (end of compulsory education). An Approach with Reference Points.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division, http:// www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Source2010_ForumGeneva/1_ LIS-Literature2011_EN.pdf (accessed 29 January, 2017).
Schleppegrell, M.J. and O’Halloran, K.L. 2011. “Teaching Academic Language in L2 Secondary Settings.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31:3–18.
Schleppegrell, M.J. 2006. “The Challenges of Academic Language in School Subjects.” In Språket och kunskapen: att lära på sitt andraspråk i skola och högskola, edited by I. Lindberg and K. Sandwall, 47–69. Göteborg, Sweden: Göteborgs universitet, Institutet för svenska som andraspråk.
Schleppegrell, M.J. 2001. Linguistic Features of the Language of Schooling. Linguistics and Education 12 (4):432–59.
Sherris, A. 2008. Integrated Content and Language Instruction. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics (cal).
Thürmann, E., Vollmer, H. and I. Pieper. 2010. “Language(s) of Schooling: Focusing on Vulnerable Learners.” Document prepared for the Policy Forum: The right of learners to quality and equity in education – The role of linguistic and intercultural competences, Geneva, Switzerland, 2–4 November 2010. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division, http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/ Source2010_ForumGeneva/2-VulnerLLearnersThurm_EN.pdf (accessed 29 January 2017).
Vollmer, H.J. 2010. “Items for a Description of Linguistic Competence in the Language of Schooling necessary for Learning/teaching Sciences (at the end of compulsory education). An Approach with Reference Points.” Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division, https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/Source/Source2010_Forum Geneva/1-LIS-sciences2010_EN.pdf (accessed 29 January, 2017).
Yang Hansen, K. and I. Munck. 2012. “Exploring the Measurement Profiles of Socioeconomic Background Indicators and their Differences in Reading Achievement: A Two-level Latent Class Analysis.” In Issues and Methodologies in Large-Scale Assessments. ieri Monograph Series, 5:49–77. Educational Testing Service and International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Copyright (c) 2017 Eli Moe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).