New perspectives on grammatical change in heritage Norwegian

Introducing the adult speaker and adolescent relearner

Authors

  • Alexander K. Lykke Østfold University College
  • Arnstein Hjelde Østfold University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v12i2.3827

Keywords:

grammatical change, heritage relearning, balanced bilingualism, speaker demographics, heritage language exposure

Abstract

This study introduces two speaker types, which have not yet been studied, to the study of heritage Norwegian: one adult (48, i.e., not elderly) and one adolescent speaker (16), “Kari” and “Jess”. They are both North American, English-dominant heritage speakers of Norwegian (AmNo), but differ from an older, previously studied cohort of American Norwegian speakers (old AmNo) in several respects. Kari and Jess have had more continuous contact with Norway throughout their lives. They are both Norwegian-literate and consume Norwegian-language media. Jess has attended Norwegian language courses in Norway, which motivates seeing her as a heritage language relearner. In this pilot study, we test the hypothesis that such extra-linguistic factors lead to grammatical differences between the groups. The hypothesis is tested by the analysis of three variables previously studied in old AmNo speakers: verb-second word order in non-subject initial clauses, possessive placement, and grammatical gender. We drew data from a 48-minute semi-structured speech recording. The study found that Kari and Jess indeed differ from old AmNo speakers. Kari’s language shows very little grammatical innovation, placing her among the most stable AmNo speakers. Jess’ language, in contrast, shows strongly innovative tendencies in all studied variables. To explain the innovations in Jess’ language, we appeal to heterogeneous input during childhood acquisition and cross-linguistic influence from English. Both factors, we argue, are active in the process of heritage language relearning.

References

Fisher, Rose, David Natvig, Erin Pretorius, Michael T. Putnam & Katharina S. Schuhmann. 2022. Why Is Inflectional Morphology Difficult to Borrow?— Distributing and Lexicalizing Plural Allomorphy in Pennsylvania Dutch. Languages 7(2). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020086

Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York, NY: MacMillan.

Johannessen, Janne B. 2015a. Attrition in an American Norwegian heritage language speaker. In Janne B. Johannessen & Joseph C. Salmons (Eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in America. Acquisition, attrition and change. 46–71. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.18.02joh

Johannessen, Janne B. 2015b. The corpus of American Norwegian speech (CANS). In Beáta Megyesi (Ed.), Proceedings of the 20th Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, NODALIDA. 297–300. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/43898/2/NODALIDA-CANS-proc-trykt-2015.pdf (31 May 2022)

Johannessen, Janne B. & Ida Larsson. 2015. Complexity matters: On gender agreement in Heritage Scandinavian. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01842

Lohndal, Terje, & Marit Westergaard. 2016. Grammatical gender in American Norwegian heritage language: Stability or attrition? Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00344

Lykke, Alexander K. 2018. The relation between finiteness morphology and verb- second: An empirical study of heritage Norwegian. In Jan H. Petersen & Karoline Kühl (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Immigrant Languages in the Americas (WILA 8). 71–79 Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project

Lykke, Alexander K. 2020. Variation and Change in the Tense Morphology of Heritage Norwegian in North America. Oslo: University of Oslo dissertation. Lødrup, Helge. 2011. Hvor mange genus er det i Oslo-dialekten? Maal og minne 103(2). 120–136.

Polinsky, Maria. 2015. When L1 becomes an L3: Do heritage speakers make better L3 learners? Bilingualism 18. 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000667

Putnam, Michael T., Matthew Carlson & David Reitter. 2018. Integrated, not isolated: Defining typological proximity in an integrated multilingual architecture. Frontiers in Psychology 8. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02212

Rødvand, Linn I. S. 2018. Systematic variation in the gender system in American Norwegian. In Jan H. Petersen & Karoline Kühl (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Immigrant Languages in the Americas (WILA 8). 88-95. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Westergaard, Marit & Merete Anderssen. 2015. Word order variation in Norwegian possessive constructions. In Janne B. Johannessen & Joseph C. Salmons (Eds.), Germanic Heritage Languages in North America. 21–45. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/silv.18.01wes

Westergaard, Marit, & Lohndal, Terje. 2019. Verb second word order in Norwegian heritage language: Syntax and pragmatics. In David W. Lightfoot & Jonathan Havenhill (Eds.), Variable Properties in Language: Their Nature and Acquisition, 91–102. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvfxv99p.12

Downloads

Published

2022-12-19

How to Cite

Lykke , Alexander K., and Arnstein Hjelde. 2022. “New Perspectives on Grammatical Change in Heritage Norwegian: Introducing the Adult Speaker and Adolescent Relearner”. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 12 (2):63-76. https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v12i2.3827.