Community and identity in environmental activism on Twitter: A discourse-based approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v13i1.3989Abstract
Online communities play an integral role in understanding environmental activist identities. Using #climatestrikeonline tweets as a case study we discuss the benefits of applying the framework of digital pragmatics (under the umbrella of discourse analysis) to study the repositories of online media texts that share the attributes of both interpersonal and mass communication (Koteyko, Nerlich, and Hellsten 2015). Our analysis draws on two arguments central to discourse-based approaches: (1) that social meanings must be analysed across different modes (e.g., by including visuals) and (2) that analysis of digital artefacts needs to consider both their content features and the contexts in which they emerge. We demonstrate how using digital pragmatics to study networked communication about climate change can help us understand how engagement and collaboration are achieved in online communities of practice.
References
Barnard, S. 2016. Spectacles of self(ie) empowerment? Networked individualism and the logic of the (post)feminist selfie. Communication and Information Technologies Annual: [New] Media Cultures Studies in Media and Communications 11: 63–88.
Benford, R. D., and D. A. Snow. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611
Benwell, B., and E. Stokoe. 2006. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Bennett, L., and A. Segerberg. 2012. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society 15(5): 739-768.
Bizzell, P. 1982. College composition: Initiation into the academic discourse community. Curriculum Inquiry 12(2): 191–207.
Boulianne, S. et al. 2020. “School Strike 4 Climate”: social media and the International Youth Protest on Climate Change. Media and Communication 8(2): 208–218.
Bucher, T., and A. Helmond. 2018. The Affordances of Social Media Platforms. In The SAGE Handbook of Social Media, 233-253, ed. Jean Burgess, Alice Marwick and Thomas Poell. London: Sage.
Bucholtz, M., and K. Hall. 2005. Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach. Discourse Studies 7(4-5): 585-614.
Christofaro, B. 2022. How Fridays for Future keeps the spotlight on the climate. Deutche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/how-fridays-for-future-keeps-the-climate-relevant-as-other-crises-rage/a-61232469
Clayton, S. 2003. Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, ed. Susan Clayton and Susan Opotow, 45-66. Cambridge & London: The MIT Press.
Daston, L., and P. Galison. 1992. The Image of Objectivity. Representations 40 : 81-128.
Elliott, L. 2022. History of the environmental movement. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/environmentalism/History-of-the-environmental-movement
Entman, R. M. 1993. Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51-58.
Evans, H., Ginnis, S., and J. Bartlett. 2015. #SocialEthics: A Guide to Embedding Ethics in Social Media Research. London: IpsosMORI.
Forsyth, D. R., M. van Vugt, G. Schlein and P. A. Story. 2015. Identity and Sustainability: Localized Sense of Community Increases Environmental Engagement. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 15(1): 233-252.
Fridays For Future.2022. How to strike. https://fridaysforfuture.org/take-action/how-to-strike/
Georgalou, M. 2017. Discourse and identity on Facebook. Bloomsbury, London.
Georgalou, M. 2021. New Greek migrant (dis)identifications in social media: Evidence from a discourse-centred online ethnographic study. Nature: Humanities & Social Sciences Communication 8(155): 1-13.
Haunss, S., and M. Sommer. 2020. Fridays For Future – Die Jugend Gegen Klimawandel: Klimawandel: Konturen der weltweiten Protestbewegung. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Hutchby, I. 2001. Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology 35(2): 441–456.
Kim, D., and Vorobel, O. 2015. Discourse communities: from origins to social media. In Discourse and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ed. Stanton Wortham, Deoksoon Kim, and Stephen May, 267–281. Cham: Springer.
Klandermans, P.G. 2014. Identity politics and politicized identities: Identity processes and the dynamics of protest. Political Psychology 35: 1–22.
Lahsen, M. 2021. Evaluating the computational (“Big Data”) turn in studies of media coverage of climate change. WIREs Climate Change 13(2): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.752
Lei, L. 2021. Exploring ecological identity from the perspective of systemic functional linguistics. Journal of World Languages 7(3): 487-514.
Loader, B. D., and D. Mercea. 2012. Social media and democracy. Innovations in Participatory Politics. London: Routledge.
Mackay, C. M. L., F. Cristoffanini, J. D. Wright, S. D. Neufeld, H. F. Ogawa and M. T. Schmitt. 2021. Connection to nature and environmental activism: Politicized environmental identity mediates a relationship between identification with nature and observed environmental activist behaviour. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 2: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2021.100009
Merry, M. K. 2013. Tweeting for a Cause: Microblogging and Environmental Advocacy. Policy & Internet 5(3): 304-327.
Moser, S.C. 2010. History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews – Climate Change 1(1): 31-53.
Nikunen, K. 2019. Once a refugee: selfie activism, visualized citizenship and the space of appearance. Popular Communication 17(2): 154–170.
Nisbet, E.K., Zelenski, J.M., and S. A. Murphy. 2008. The nature relatedness scale: linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environmental Behaviour 41 (5): 715-740.
Owen, A., Videras, J., and S. Wu. 2010. Identity and Environmentalism: The Influence of Community Characteristic. Review of Social Economy 68(4): 465-486.
Page, R. 2012. Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. Routledge, London.
Pang, N., and P. Law. 2017. Retweeting #WorldEnvironmentDay: A study of content features and visual rhetoric in an environmental movement. Computers in Human Behavior 69: 54–61.
Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., and N. Sánchez Querubín. 2019. The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 10(2): e569.
Pomeroy, R. 2020. Greta calls for climate strikes to shift from the streets to the internet during coronavirus crisis. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/greta/
Schmitt, M.T., Mackay, C.M.L., Droogendyk, L.M., and D. Payne. 2019. What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environ- mental identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 61: 20–29.
Scott, K. 2022. Pragmatics Online. London and New York: Routledge.
Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
Suitner, C. et al. 2022. The rise of #climateaction in the time of the FridaysForFuture movement: A semantic network analysis. Social Networks 1-16.
Snow, D., and R. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1(1): 197-217.
Svensson, J. 2011. The Expressive Turn of Citizenship in Digital Late Modernity. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government 3(1): 42-56.
Swales, J. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tien Vu, H. et al. 2021. Social Media and Environmental Activism: Framing Climate Change on Facebook by Global NGOs. Science Communication 43(1): 91-115.
Twitter. 2022a. Display requirements: Tweets https://developer.twitter.com/en/developer-terms/display-requirements
Twitter. 2022b. Private information and media policy. https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/personal-information
UNEP. 2022. Champions of the Earth. https://www.unep.org/championsofearth/laureates/2019/fridays-future-movement
Varis, P., and J. Blommaert. 2015. Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures. Multilingual Margins: A Journal of Multilingualism from the Periphery 2(1): 31-45.
Williams, M. L., Burnap , P., and L. Sloan. 2017. Towards an Ethical Framework for Publishing Twitter Data in Social Research: Taking into Account Users’ Views, Online Context and Algorithmic Estimation. Sociology 51(6): 1149-1168.
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yeo, S. 2020. How the largest environmental movement in history was born. https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200420-earth-day-2020-how-an-environmental-movement-was-born
Young, J. C., Carsten Conner, L. D., and E. Pettit. 2020. “You really see it”: environmental identity shifts through interacting with a climate change-impacted glacier landscape. International Journal of Science Education 42(18): 3049-3070.
Zeller, J. 2021. Environmental activism: Climate strike online. Goethe Institut. https://www.goethe.de/en/kul/ges/22125676.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nelya Koteyko, Dimitrinka Atanasova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
