Toronto Heritage Italian (r): Maintaining homeland patterns
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v14i1.4338Abstract
Contrary to experimental research, comparative variationist approaches find for heritage speakers many cases of maintenance of the homeland grammar. We analyze patterns of rhotic production in spontaneous speech of the heritage Calabrese Italian community of Toronto, Canada, and its homeland counterpart in Calabria, Italy. 1,555 tokens of word-internal, singleton /r/ were collected from the HLVC corpus and analyzed using mixed-effects models. Results show an ongoing pattern of lenition for both homeland and heritage speakers. Heritage speakers further develop this language internal trend, indicating grammar boosting. Homeland social constraints are maintained by heritage speakers. We find no evidence of transfer from English or simplification in the heritage language. Similar patterns of rhotic lenition are found in heritage Tagalog (Umbal & Nagy 2021) and Russian (Nagy 2024), though with different social constraints. Cross-linguistic comparison proves that variation in heritage languages is not necessarily caused by contact, and that change needn’t be related to indexicality.
References
Andriani, Luigi, Roberta D’Alessandro, Alberto Frasson, Brechje van Osch, Luana Sorgini & Sil- via Terenghi. 2022. Adding the microdimension to the study of language in contact. Three case studies. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 7(1). 1–36. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5748.
Baird, Anissa, Angela Cristiano, & Naomi Nagy. 2021. Apocope in Heritage Italian. Languages 6. 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030120.
Barry, William J. 1997. Another R-tickle. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27(1– 2). 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300005405.
Bauer, Laurie. 2008. Lenition revisited. Journal of Linguistics 44(3). 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226708005331.
Benmamoun, Elabbas, Silvina Montrul & Maria Polinsky. 2013. Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 39(3–4). 129– 181. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2013-0009.
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. http://www.praat.org/
Bousquette, Joshua & Michael T. Putnam. 2020. Redefining language death: Evidence from mor- ibund grammars. Language Learning 70(S1): 188–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12362.
Canepari, Luciano. 1999. MaPI - Manuale di Pronuncia Italiana. Bologna: Zanichelli.
Celata, Chiara. 2014. Per una sociofonetica sperimentale delle lingue romanze: la variabile (r) a Modica. Proceedings of the XIII International Conference of SILFI (Società Internazionale di Linguistica e Filologia Italiana), Modica.
Celata, Chiara, Chiara Meluzzi & Irene Ricci. 2016. The sociophonetics of rhotic variation in Si- cilian dialects and Sicilian Italian: Corpus, methodology and first results. Loquens 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/loquens.2016.025.
Chambers, Jack K. & Peter Trudgill. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cristiano, Angela. 2022. (r) in Heritage Calabrese Italian: Cross-generational nativeness. Uni- versity of Bologna: MA thesis [unpublished].
De Blasi, Nicola. 2014. Geografia e storia dell’italiano regionale. Bologna: il Mulino.
Flores, Cristina & Esther Rinke. 2020. The relevance of language-internal variation in predicting heritage language grammars. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23. 25–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000464.
Honeybone, Patrick. 2008. Lenition, weakening and consonantal strength: tracing concepts through the history of phonology. In Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral (eds.), Lenition and fortition, 9–93. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211443.1.9
Jaworski, Sylwester. 2010. Phonetic realisations of the Polish rhotic intervocalic position: A pilot study. Annales Neophilologiarum 4. 125–140.
Johnson, Daniel E. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed‐effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x.
Kirchner, Robert M. 2013. An effort-based approach to consonant lenition. London/New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315023731
Labov, William. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In John Baugh & Joel Scherzer (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics, 28–53. Eng- lewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Lindau, Mona. 1985. The story of r. In V. A. Fromkin (ed.), Phonetic linguistics, 157–168. Or- lando, FL: Academic Press.
Lindblom, Bjorn E.F. 1990. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Wil- liam J. Hardcastle & Alain Marshal (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2037-8_16.
Nagy, Naomi. 2009. Heritage language variation and change. https://ngn.artsci.utoronto.ca/HLVC/.
Nagy, Naomi. 2011. A multilingual corpus to explore geographic variation. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata 43(1-2). 65–84.
Nagy, Naomi. 2015. A sociolinguistic view of null subjects and VOT in Toronto heritage lan- guages. Lingua 164. 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.012.
Nagy, Naomi. 2024. Heritage languages: Extending variationist approaches. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108983624
Nagy, Naomi & Miriam Meyerhoff. 2015. Extending ELAN into variationist sociolinguistics. Lin- guistics Vanguard 1(1). 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2015-0012.
Polinsky, Maria. 2018. Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107252349
Poplack, Shana, & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2001. African American English in the diaspora. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.
Rennicke, Iiris E. 2015. Variation and change in the rhotics of Brazilian Portuguese. University of Helsinki: PhD Dissertation.
Rickford, John & Faye McNair-Knox. 1992. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quan- titative sociolinguistic study. In Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan (eds.), Perspectives on register: Situating register variation within sociolinguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Romano, Antonio. 2013. A preliminary contribution to the study of phonetic variation of /r/ in Italian and Italo-Romance. In Lorenzo Spreafico & Alessandro Vietti (eds.), Rhotics. New data and perspectives, 209–226. Bozen: Bolzano University Press.
Scobbie, James. 2006. (R) as a Variable. Encyclopedia of language & linguistics, Second Edition, 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/04711-8
Sebregts, Koen. 2014. The sociophonetics and phonology of Dutch r. PhD Dissertation, Utrecht University.
Spreafico, Lorenzo, Chiara Celata, Alessandro Vietti, Chiara Bertini & Irene Ricci. 2015. An EPG+UTI study of Italian /r/. ICPhS 2015: 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sci- ences. Glasgow.
Umbal, Pocholo & Naomi Nagy. 2021. Heritage Tagalog phonology and a variationist framework of language contact. Languages 6. 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6040201.
Van Hout, Roeland & Hans Van de Velde. 2001. Patterns of /r/ variation. In Roeland Van Hout & Hans Van de Velde (eds.), 'r-atics. Sociolinguistic, phonetic and phonological characteris- tics of /r/, 1–10. Bruxelles: ILVP. https://hdl.handle.net/2066/104358.
Vietti, Alessandro, Lorenzo Spreafico & Antonio Romano. 2010. Tempi e modi di conservazione delle r italiane nei frigoriferi CLIPS. In Stephan Schmid, Michael Schwarzenbach & Dieter Studer-Joho (eds.), La dimensione temporale del parlato, 113–128. Torriana: EDK. https://hdl.handle.net/2318/83646.
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), 1556– 1559. Genoa: European Language Resources Association. https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1E7E-4.
