Marked themes in English and Norwegian academic texts in the field of didactics
Cover for BeLLs vol. 9, issue 1
PDF

Keywords

thematic structure
marked themes
contrastive analysis
English/Norwegian

How to Cite

Rørvik, Sylvi, and Marte Monsen. 2018. “Marked Themes in English and Norwegian Academic Texts in the Field of Didactics”. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v9i1.1521.

Abstract

This study investigates the use of marked themes in the field of didactics. The material comprises research articles written in L1 English and Norwegian, and L2 English. The aim is to shed light on contrastive differences between Norwegian and English that may be used to inform novice writers about central textual features of academic texts within the field of didactics, and about potential transfer-related features that might give their texts a “foreign accent”. The results show that there are contrastive differences in the realization of and meanings expressed by marked themes, but that these differences cause few problems for L2 writers. The study further supports findings from previous research that show the importance of text type and academic discipline for thematic structure.

https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v9i1.1521
PDF

Copyright (c) 2018 Sylvi Rørvik, Marte Monsen

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Bergen Open Access Publishing