The FAIL TO construction: A contrastive perspective
Cover for BeLLs vol. 9, issue 1
PDF

Keywords

failure
periphrastic negation
inherent negation
grammaticalisation
English/ Norwegian

How to Cite

Egan, Thomas. 2018. “The FAIL TO Construction: A Contrastive Perspective”. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v9i1.1525.

Abstract

This article considers the various senses of the English fail to construction in the light of its Norwegian translation correspondences. This construction has been alleged to be in the process of grammaticalising as a marker of negation in Present-day English. The paper tests the hypothesis that if fail to is in the process of grammaticalising as a marker of negation pure and simple, we should find it used to translate, or find it translated by, pure negation markers (the equivalent of English not) in other languages. The particular language of translation investigated in this paper is Norwegian in which the default negation marker is ikke. It is shown that translations in both directions lend support to the hypothesis.

https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v9i1.1525
PDF

Copyright (c) 2018 Thomas Egan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Bergen Open Access Publishing