Language and Conflict: Arguing for Interdisciplinarity and Usefulness

Authors

  • Karol Janicki University of Bergen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v7i0.1093

Abstract

This paper consists of two parts. Part 1 concerns the benefits of interdisciplinary research, and it concludes with a philosophical section in which the question is raised of what kinds of linguistic research can be seen as socially valid. In Part 2, I discuss my own recent research, which I consider socially relevant. It includes two major topics: (1) language and conflict, and (2) folk linguistics. Under the heading of ‘language and conflict’, I have investigated some of the ways language can contribute to both instigating and alleviating conflict. In my opinion, the way we view meaning, communication, and definitions is central to our understanding of and avoiding language-ridden conflict. As for ‘folk linguistics’, which concerns the layperson’s views of language, I have investigated the question of what the lay people see as the most important language-related problems. The paper concludes with a statement supporting research in the field of the humanities.

References

Berg, Maggie, and Barbara Seeber. 2016. The Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Bod, Rens. 2013. A New History of the Humanities: The Search for Princi­ples and Patterns from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford: Oxford Uni­versity Press.

Collini, Stefan. 2012. What are Universities for? London: Penguin.

Coulthard, Malcolm, and Alison Johnson. 2007. An Introduction to Fo­rensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. New York: Routledge.

Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive Linguistics: An In­troduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr. 1999. Intentions in the Experience of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hallett, Garth L. 1991. Essentialism: A Wittgensteinian Critique. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Janicki, Karol. 1999. Against Essentialism: Toward Language Awareness. Munich: Lincom Europa.

Janicki, Karol. 2002. “A Hindrance to Communication: The Use of Dif­ficult and Incomprehensible Language.” International Journal of Ap­plied Linguistics 12 (2):194–217.

Janicki, Karol. 2006. Language Misconceived: Arguing for Applied Cogni­tive Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.

Janicki, Karol. 2010a. “Lay People’s Language Problems.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1):73–94.

Janicki, Karol. 2010b. Confusing Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Janicki, Karol. 2011. “Communication and Understanding.” In Applied Folk Linguistics (AILA Review 24), edited by Antje Wilton and Mar­tin Stegu, 68–77. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Janicki, Karol. 2014. “Connecting the Linguist to Industry and Public In­stitutions.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 24 (1):38–49.

Janicki, Karol. 2015. Language and Conflict. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kodish, Susan Presby, and Bruce I. Kodish. 2001. Drive Yourself Sane: Using the Uncommon Sense of General Semantics. Pasadena, CA.: Ex­tensional Publishers.

Korzybski, Alfred. 1933. Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aris­totelian Systems and General Semantics. Clinton, MA.: Colonial Press.

Kronman, Anthony. 2008. Education’s End: Why our Colleges and Uni­versities Have Given up on the Meaning of Life. New Haven: Yale Uni­versity Press.

Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Nussbaum, Martha. 2012. Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Hu­manities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Phillips, Susan U. 1998. Ideology in the Language of Judges: How Judges Practice Law, Politics, and Courtroom Control. Oxford: Oxford Uni­versity Press.

Popper, Karl. 1972. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Ox­ford: Clarendon.

Roberts, Celia. 2003. “Applied Linguistics Applied”. In Applied Linguis­tics and Communities of Practice, edited by Srikant Sarangi and Theo van Leeuwen, 132–49. (British Studies in Applied Linguistics). Lon­don: Continuum.

Shermer, Michael. 2011. The Believing Brain: From Spiritual Faiths to Po­litical Convictions. How to Construct Beliefs and Reinforce them as Truths. London: Constable and Robinson Ltd.

Small, Helen H. 2013. The Value of the Humanities. Oxford: Oxford Uni­versity Press.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-08

How to Cite

Janicki, Karol. 2017. “Language and Conflict: Arguing for Interdisciplinarity and Usefulness”. Bergen Language and Linguistics Studies 7 (September). https://doi.org/10.15845/bells.v7i0.1093.